Nouvelles diverses | Page 88

Gouvernance Nouvelles diverses

Gouvernance d’entreprise : mettez-vous à jour sur des questions d’actualité

Ivan Tchotourian 3 janvier 2017

Bonjour à toutes et à tous, quelle belle initiative de l’ECGI !

La seconde conférence de l’ECGI qui s’est tenue en Suède en juin 2016 est maintenant disponible. Vidéos, papiers et diaporamas sont maintenant disponibles au lien suivant : http://gcgc.global/events/stockholm-2016/#presentations.

Le programme était alléchant. Le voici :

• Commitment and Entrenchment in Corporate Governance

Prof. Simone Sepe University of Arizona

• Contracts versus Institutions: A Critique of Corporate Governance Theory

Prof. Martin Hellwig Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods

• Price and Probability: Decomposing the Takeover Effects of Anti-Takeover Provisions

Prof. Vicente Cunat London School of Economics

• Can Staggered Boards Improve Value? Evidence from the Massachusetts Natural Experiment

Prof. Robert Daines​ Stanford University

• Corporate Leverage and Employee Protection in Bankruptcy

Prof. Marco Pagano University of Naples

• Three Ages of Bankruptcy

Prof. Mark Roe Harvard Law School

• Political Determinants of Competition

Prof. Luigi Zingales University of Chicago Booth School of Business

• Panel: The Corporate Governance of Infrastructure

Prof. Erik Berglof  London School of Economics Mr. Gordon Bajnai  Meridiam Prof. Patrick Bolton Columbia Business School Dr. Rajiv B. Lall  IDFC Bank, India

• Are Foreign Investors Locusts? The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Institutional Ownership

Prof. Pedro Matos University of Virginia

• Does Majority Voting Improve Board Accountability?

Prof. Jill Fisch University of Pennsylvania

• Bonded to the State: A Network Perspective on China’s Corporate Debt Market

Prof. Curtis Milhaupt Columbia Law School

• Corporate Governance Indices and Construct Validity

Prof. Bernard Black  Kellogg School of Management

• Panel: The Governance of Business Groups

Prof. Gerard Hertig ETZ Ms. Claudia Biedermann Zurich Insurance Group AG Ms. Petra Hedengran Investor AB Ms. Daniela Weber-Rey Deutsche Bank AG

• Are CEOs Different? Characteristics of Top Managers

Prof. Steven Kaplan  University of Chicago Booth School of Business

• Executive Remuneration Standards and the “Conformity Gap” at Controlled Corporations

Prof. Guido Ferrarini  University of Genoa

• The Responsibility of Business is to Pursue Shareholder Value: True or False?

Prof. Oliver Hart Harvard University

À la prochaine…

Ivan Tchotourian

Nouvelles diverses rémunération

Rémunération des dirigeants canadiens : le rapport alarmant du CCPA

Ivan Tchotourian 3 janvier 2017

Le Centre canadien des politiques alternatives qui a suivi le salaire des PDG du pays sur10 ans affirme que ce groupe aura empoché le salaire moyen annuel d’un Canadien travaillant à temps plein vers 11h47 mardi, le premier jour de travail de l’année pour la majorité des gens.

Selon un rapport intitulé « Throwing Money at the Problem 10 Years of Executive Compensation » :

Despite public outrage over exorbitantly high compensation packages, CEO pay has continued unabated, weathering all kinds of economic storms, and soaring to new highs. This year’s report finds that Canada’s highest paid 100 CEOs have set a new record: their total compensation in 2015 hit a new high at $9.5 million, or 193 times more than someone earning an average wage. They earn the average Canadian wage ($49,510) by 11:47 a.m. on January 3—the first working day of the year.

3 recommandations sont faites :

• One line of attack would be to take compensation decisions out of the hands of the board of directors entirely, by making shareholder votes on pay mandatory rather than advisory.
• A second, less dramatic, change would be to change the accountability of compensation advisors to make them accountable to shareholders rather than to the board, like auditors.
• In the absence of corporate board leadership, it falls to government.

Pour une synthèse, vous pourrez lire l’article suivant sur La presse.ca.

À la prochaine…

Ivan Tchotourian

Gouvernance Nouvelles diverses Valeur actionnariale vs. sociétale

Court-termisme : les propositions de The Aspen Institute

Ivan Tchotourian 2 janvier 2017

The Aspen Institute (par l’intermédiaire de The American Prosperity Project Working Group) vient de publier un rapport proposant de contrer le court-termisme qui gangrène les entreprises américaines. Dans « The American Prosperity Project: Policy Framework », le groupe de travail propose 3 pistes de solutions qui sont les suivantes :

1. Focus government investment on recognized drivers of long-term productivity growth and global competitiveness—namely, infrastructure, basic science research, private R&D, and skills training—in order to close the decades-long investment shortfall in America’s future. Building this foundation will support good jobs and new business formation, support workers affected by globalization and technology, and better position America to address the national debt through long-term economic growth.
2. Unlock business investment by modernizing our corporate tax system to achieve one that is simpler, fair to businesses across the spectrum of size and industry, and supportive of both productivity growth and job creation. Changes to the corporate tax system could reduce the federal corporate statutory tax rate (at 35%, the highest in the world), broaden the base of corporate tax payers, bring off-shore capital back to the US, and reward long-term investment, and help provide revenues to assure that America’s long-term goals can be met.
3. Align public policy and corporate governance protocols to facilitate companies’ and investors’ focus on long-term investment. Complex layers of market pressures, governance regulations, and business norms encourage short-term thinking in business and finance. The goal is a better environment for long-term investing by business leaders and investors, and to provide better outcomes for society.

Pour une synthèse de ce rapport de travail, vous pourrez lire cet excellent article d’Alana Semuels dans The Atlantic « How to Stop Short-Term Thinking at America’s Companies » (30 décembre 2016).

There was a time, half a century ago, when what was good for many American corporations tended to also be good for America. Companies invested in their workers and new technologies, and as a result, they prospered and their employees did too.

Now, a growing group of business leaders is worried that companies are too concerned with short-term profits, focused only on making money for shareholders. As a result, they’re not investing in their workers, in research, or in technology—short-term costs that would reduce profits temporarily. And this, the business leaders say, may be creating long-term problems for the nation.

“Too many CEOs play the quarterly game and manage their businesses accordingly,” Paul Polman, the CEO of the British-Dutch conglomerate Unilever, told me. “But many of the world’s challenges can not be addressed with a quarterly mindset.”

Polman is one of a group of CEOs and business leaders that have signed onto the American Prosperity Project, an initiative spearheaded by the Aspen Institute, to encourage companies and the nation to engage in more long-term thinking. The group, which includes CEOs such as Chip Bergh of Levi Strauss and Ian Read of Pfizer, board directors such as Janet Hill of Wendy’s and Stanley Bergman of Henry Schein, Inc., and labor leaders such as Damon Silvers of the AFL-CIO, have issued a report encouraging the government to make it easier for companies to think in the long-term by investing in infrastructure and changing both the tax code and corporate governance laws.

À la prochaine…

Ivan Tchotourian

autres publications Gouvernance mission et composition du conseil d'administration Nouvelles diverses

Administrateur activiste : le dernier ouvrage de Millstein

Ivan Tchotourian 2 janvier 2017

En cette période de fêtes qui se termine, pourquoi ne pas vous offrir le dernier ouvrage d’Ira M. Millstein sur la gouvernance d’entreprise ? Intitulé « The Activist Director: Lessons from the Boardroom and the Future of the Corporation » (Columbia University Press, décembre 2016), je ne peux que vous le recommander. Pour ma part, il est commandé, je n’attends plus que de le recevoir !

Voici le résumé :

Some of the worst corporate meltdowns over the past sixty years can be traced to passive directors who favored operational shortcuts over quality growth strategies. Thinking primarily about placating institutional investors, selective stockholders, proxy advisors, and corporate management, these inattentive and deferential board members have relied on short-term share price increases to sustain their companies long term. Driven by a desire for prosperity, not posterity, these actions can doom any company.

In The Activist Director, attorney Ira M. Millstein looks back at fifty years of counseling companies, nonprofits, and governments to actively govern their corporations and constituencies. From the threat of bankruptcy and the ConEd blackout of 1970s New York City, to the meltdown of Drexel Burnham Lambert in the late 1980s, to the turnaround of General Motors in the mid-1990s, Millstein takes readers into the boardrooms of several of the greatest catastrophes and success stories of America’s best-known corporations.

His solution lies at the top: a new breed of activist directors who partner with management and reject short-term outlooks, plan a future based on growth and innovation, and take responsibility for corporate organization, strategy, and efficiency. What questions should we ask of potential board members and how do we know they’ll be active? Millstein offers pragmatic suggestions for recruiting activist directors to the boardroom to secure the future of the corporation.

Pour en savoir plus sur ce livre, cliquez ici.

À la prochaine…

Ivan Tchotourian

Nouvelles diverses

Vision à long terme et gestion d’actifs : les propositions de l’Afg

Ivan Tchotourian 18 décembre 2016

À l’heure où les investisseurs institutionnels occupent une telle place sur les marchés et dans le capital des grandes entreprises, l’Association française de la gestion financière (AFG) a publié fin novembre un Livre Blanc, fruit des travaux menés ces derniers mois sur la compétitivité de la gestion française et de la Place de Paris.

2 axes se dégagent résumés comme suit :

• Compétitivité de la place de Paris : l’AFG propose 10 solutions pour dynamiser l’industrie de la gestion d’actifs.
• Ces mesures concrètes et ambitieuses doivent contribuer à faire de Paris la plateforme incontournable du marché européen à l’horizon 2025.

Pour en savoir plus, cliquez ici.

À la prochaine…

Ivan Tchotourian