Publications

autres publications

Commonsense Corporate Governance Principles : un appel qui doit être entendu

Les 13 bonzes du secteur économique américains ont exposé une série de principes auxquels ils voudraient voir adhérer les entreprises américaines inscrites en Bourse (voir les affaires.com) : Commonsense Corporate Governance Principles. Ces principes touchent le rôle, les responsabilités et la composition des conseils d’adminstration; les plans de succession; la rémunération des dirigeants; les droits des actionnaires; le rôle des grands gestionnaires de portefeuille; et la communication des données financières.

 

Voici un résumé des principes (ici) :

Truly independent corporate boards are vital to effective governance, so no board should be beholden to the CEO or management. Every board should meet regularly without the CEO present, and every board should have active and direct engagement with executives below the CEO level;

Diverse boards make better decisions, so every board should have members with complementary and diverse skills, backgrounds and experiences. It’s also important to balance wisdom and judgment that accompany experience and tenure with the need for fresh thinking and perspectives of new board members;

Every board needs a strong leader who is independent of management. The board’s independent directors usually are in the best position to evaluate whether the roles of chairman and CEO should be separate or combined; and if the board decides on a combined role, it is essential that the board have a strong lead independent director with clearly defined authorities and responsibilities;

Our financial markets have become too obsessed with quarterly earnings forecasts. Companies should not feel obligated to provide earnings guidance — and should do so only if they believe that providing such guidance is beneficial to shareholders;

A common accounting standard is critical for corporate transparency, so while companies may use non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to explain and clarify their results, they never should do so in such a way as to obscure GAAP-reported results; and in particular, since stock- or options-based compensation is plainly a cost of doing business, it always should be reflected in non-GAAP measurements of earnings; and

Effective governance requires constructive engagement between a company and its shareholders. So the company’s institutional investors making decisions on proxy issues important to long-term value creation should have access to the company, its management and, in some circumstances, the board; similarly, a company, its management and board should have access to institutional investors’ ultimate decision makers on those issues.

 

À la prochaine…

Ivan Tchotourian